Accumulating evidence suggests that transcriptional regulation is required for maintenance of
Accumulating evidence suggests that transcriptional regulation is required for maintenance of long-term memories (LTMs). acetyl Indacaterol supplier transferases (HATs) and DNA methylases3. In particular, CREB forms a complex with the HAT, CREB-binding protein (CBP), required for LTM formation4,5,6. Even though importance of the HAT activity of CBP in LTM has been debated7,8, dynamic alteration in histone acetylation after leaning9,10 and suppression of LTM by counteracting protein to HAT, histone deacetylase 2 (ref. 11), supports a model where histone acetylation is usually important in LTM formation. Recent studies suggest that changes in transcription are also actively involved during Rabbit Polyclonal to CDKAP1 memory storage12,13. In forms aversive olfactory associations if they are exposed to an odour (the conditioned stimulus or CS) paired with electric shocks (the unconditioned stimulus). Flies form LTM of this association if they are trained repeatedly in this association with rest intervals interspersed between trainings (spaced training)17. In MBs. We found that transcriptional regulation for LTM maintenance is usually unique from that for LTM formation. Although formation depends on CREB and CBP, subsequent maintenance, up to 4 days after formation, is dependent on CREB and another coactivator, CRTC (CREB-regulated transcription coactivator). Later maintenance no longer requires CREB/CRTC activity, but requires activity of another transcription factor, Bx. We finally demonstrate that this shift of transcription system is critical for restricting modification of LTM to early Indacaterol supplier stage of LTM maintenance. Our results suggest that memory maintenance is usually a dynamic, shifting process with unique temporal functions. Results Shifting CREB-related functions in LTM As CREB plays a pivotal role in LTM formation in and other species21, we first tested whether CREB activity is still required for LTM maintenance. In transgene from your MB247-switch (MBsw) driver, where expression of can be induced in the MBs by feeding flies RU486 (RU; ref. 23). When expression was induced 1 day after spaced training, we found amazing impairment in 4-day LTM (memory 4 days after spaced training; Fig. 1a). LTM formation requires the CREB coactivator CBP4,5,6,24. To test whether CBP is also required for LTM maintenance, we performed RNA interference (RNAi)-based knockdown of (2 days before spaced training significantly disrupted 1-day LTM (Fig. 1b), knocking down from 1 to 4 days after training did not affect 4-day LTM (Fig. 1a). These results suggest that although transcriptional activity of CREB is still required, a different CREB coactivator may be recruited for LTM maintenance. Physique 1 CREB/CRTC is required for LTM maintenance but not for LTM formation. In addition to CBP, CRTC also regulates transcriptional activity of CREB25. As reported previously24, expression of in the MBs did Indacaterol supplier not affect 1-day LTM after spaced training (Fig. 1b)24. However, knockdown of CRTC from 1 to 4 days after training significantly disrupted 4-day LTM (Fig. 1a) and 7-day LTM (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, neither expressing nor from 4 to 7 days after spaced training affected 7-day LTM (Fig. 1d). This suggests that CREB/CRTC activity in the MBs is required for LTM maintenance from 1 to 4 days after training, but not for maintenance from 4 to 7 days. Thus, a different transcription system may maintain LTM after 4 days. The requirement of CREB/CRTC for maintenance of LTM 1 to 4 days after training is also supported by the localization of CRTC (Fig. 1eCn). In the inactive state, CRTC is usually phosphorylated and sequestered in the cytoplasm24,25. On activation, CRTC is usually dephosphorylated and translocates into the nucleus to promote CREB-dependent gene expression26,27. We observed nuclear translocation of CRTC at 1.5?h after spaced training (Supplementary Fig. 1aCc). This translocation was not observed after massed training.